Saudi banks' presence in Malaysia and absence from India reflects strategic and smart capital allocation aligning institutional capabilities with market structures that enable optimal monetization.
Strategic selectivity recognizes structural differences, deploying capital where competitive advantages generate optimal returns. Saudi banks' Islamic finance expertise—their core competitive differentiation—cannot be monetized in India's conventional banking framework, which lacks Islamic banking provisions, sukuk markets, or Shariah supervisory infrastructure.
Investing money in areas where foreign banks can't stand out in their skills or strengths (such as unique offerings) would mean they have to compete by becoming bigger and offering traditional banking services.
Essentially, they would be trying to compete directly with well-established local banks in India that already have large networks and strong reputations.
According to the latest available data, Al Rajhi Bank's Malaysia operations generated a net profit of SAR 78.2 million in 2023—nearly 10 times Kuwait subsidiary's SAR 8.1 million and 59% higher than Jordan subsidiary's SAR 49.2 million.
Further, the bank’s 77% y/y profit growth in Malaysia (2024) demonstrates the strategic value of operating in markets with aligned Islamic finance ecosystems.
India's Developmental Banking Model
India's banking sector reflects deliberate policy choices prioritizing financial inclusion at domestic industries and underbanked districts over purely commercial returns.
The Reserve Bank of India mandates that foreign banks with 20+ branches allocate 40% of Adjusted Net Bank Credit to priority sectors—agriculture, micro enterprises, education, housing—supporting India's development agenda.
These requirements, combined with case-by-case branch licensing directing infrastructure, with a focus on underbanked districts, have successfully created world-class domestic champions: State Bank of India, India’s leading public sector bank, operates 22,500 branches across India that serve 500 million customers.
While HDFC and ICICI Banks, India’s two leading private sector banks, have a combined market capitalisation of approx. $264 billion (December 2024). Foreign banks find it rather challenging to compete with such banks in India.
For foreign banks operating in India, the rules and regulations make it hard for them to run profitably. They are required to lend a certain amount to priority sectors, which reduces their profit margins compared to other markets without such rules.
Additionally, restrictions on opening new branches slow down their ability to grow their networks quickly. This prevents them from building a large enough presence to compete effectively against local banks, which often have 10 to 20 times more branches and infrastructure.
ℹ︎
Pressure Test:
● Foreign banks face strict regulations in India ● Limited Access to Large-Scale Lending ● Foreign banks must compete against well-entrenched domestic banks ● Constraints on profitability and returns
Citigroup’s consumer banking sale to Axis Bank ( a leading Indian private sector bank) for INR 11,603 crore ($1.41 billion), completed in March 1, 2023, represented rational capital reallocation—Citigroup redirected resources to wealth management and institutional banking where competitive advantages faced fewer structural constraints.
Deutsche Bank similarly initiated sale of its retail banking operations in 2025, while Standard Chartered scaled back its consumer banking footprint are two other examples off international banks exiting the India’s market recently.
Malaysia's Islamic Finance Ecosystem
Malaysia's banking sector evolution reflects different policy priorities optimized for Islamic finance leadership.
Islamic banking credit growth of 8.1% in 2024 significantly outpaced conventional banking's 3.7%,driven by deliberate regulatory support.
This trajectory reflects structural government support: MYR 100 million ($22.2 million) have been allocated in the 2025 budget specifically for Islamic finance innovation, while Bank Negara Malaysia's Financial Sector Blueprint 2022-2026 identifies advanced value-based finance through Islamic finance leadership as strategic priority.
Further, the capital market infrastructure enables scale operations across segments. Malaysia's Islamic capital market reached RM 2.6 trillion (USD 578 billion) as at end-2024, representing over 60% of total capital markets, with sukuk outstanding at RM 1.3 trillion (approx.$290 billion).
ℹ︎
Signals : Success Factors for Islamic Banking Institutions
● Genuine expertise builds trust with customers seeking true Islamic financial services. ● Offering Islamic products as primary services enhances market reputation and competitive edge. ● Offerings that only appear to be Shariah-compliant but lack. substantive adherence to Islamic principles greatly undermine credibility ● Long-term success relies on integrating Islamic principles thoroughly into all banking operations.
Bank Negara Malaysia's January 2025 revised policy on Islamic banking windows mandates specific prudential requirements that strengthen the sector’s resilience ,while creating natural advantages for institutions with established Islamic finance expertise—precisely the competitive differentiation Saudi banks possess through decades of Shariah-compliant product development and customer relationships built on shared religious values.
Matching competitive advantages with market structures: Al Rajhi Malaysia as a case in point. Saudi banks' Malaysia presence reflect institutional discipline matching competitive advantages with market structures enabling effective monetization.
Malaysia's Islamic banking ecosystem demonstrates comprehensive four-condition alignment: Government policy explicitly prioritizes Islamic finance leadership (MYR 100M innovation funding, BNM Blueprint 2022-2026 strategic prioritization); commercial-scale demand exists (63.5% Muslim population); RM 2.6 trillion Islamic capital market infrastructure operates with established standards; and market structure rewards Islamic finance expertise.
With Islamic financing approaching the strategic 50% threshold (46.6% in 2024), Islamic banking transitions from alternative to co-dominant system architecture.
Al Rajhi Malaysia's performance (10.65% ROE, 28.9% growth in H1 2024) validates this thesis within supportive margin environments (1.93% net financing margins, 9M 2024).
Note Net financing margins refer to the difference between the interest income that a bank earns from lending money and the interest it pays on deposits or borrowed funds.
AlRajhi Bank Malaysia's financial results demonstrate alignment between institutional capabilities and supportive market structure. Its return on equity reached 10.65% in H1 2024, with net income growing 28.9% to RM 247 million.
Note ROE indicates the profitability of the bank relative to the equity held by its shareholders, showing how many units of profit the bank earns for every unit of shareholder investment.
AlRajhi’s strong performance is also supported by overall positive trends in the sector. In Malaysia's Islamic banking industry, the profit they make from financing (net financing margins) increased to 1.93% for the first nine months of 2024, up from 1.84% in the same period of 2023.
This improvement is mainly due to careful pricing strategies and a supportive regulatory environment, rather than being caused by shrinking profit margins from forced below-market lending practices. This systemic advantage becomes evident in cross-country comparisons.
The performance differential across Al Rajhi's international footprint illustrates market structure impact: identical Islamic banking expertise deployed in Malaysia's supportive ecosystem (government support, deep capital markets, and expanding Islamic market share) generates substantially higher returns than Kuwait and Jordan, where Islamic finance ecosystems lack Malaysia's structural depth and regulatory prioritization.
Comparative Deployment Analysis
The decision to invest capital is made by comparing the potential benefits and costs. For example, investing SAR 1 billion in Saudi's local market could give a 15% return.
The advantages include stable currency, familiar rules, and ongoing growth from projects aligned with Vision 2030, which makes this a good opportunity for steady, long-term growth.
Deploy SAR 1 billion to Malaysia: Generate ROE of 10%+ while diversifying geographic concentration and leveraging Islamic finance expertise in market where Islamic financing approaches 50% system share.
Deploy SAR 1 billion to India: Navigate the regulatory constraints and scale disadvantages, requiring multi-year licensing processes while competing against institutions possessing century-long domestic market advantages.
Even century-old institutions like Citigroup determined that structural disadvantages override macroeconomic growth when market frameworks favour different institutional models—validating the capital allocation principle that expected returns must exceed both cost of capital and opportunity cost of alternative deployments.
ℹ︎
Signals:
● Market structure determines which institutional models succeed. ● India's framework favours domestic scale players. ● Malaysia's favours Islamic finance expertise. ● Saudi domestic market favours established banks with government project relationships.
Saudi domestic context
Banking and profitability analysis centers on comparing return on invested capital (ROIC) against weighted average cost of capital (WACC) across deployment alternatives, factoring institutional competitive advantages within specific market contexts.
Saudi Arabia's domestic banking sector generated a net profit of SAR 79.6 billion ($21.2 billion) in 2024, reflecting sector wide return on equity (ROE) of 15.6%.
Al Rajhi Bank achieved ROE of 21.1% with a profit of SAR 19.7 billion, while Saudi Awwal Bank delivered a return on tangible equity of 16% with profit of SAR 8.1 billion.
These returns occur in the national currency (SAR) maintaining fixed USD peg within familiar regulatory environment, with financing growth at 12-14% annually, driven by Vision 2030 infrastructure development requiring SAR 1+ trillion in project finance.
Without knowing that Saudi banks earn 15-16% ROE at home, readers can't judge whether Al Rajhi's 10.65% in Malaysia is good or bad.
But once we show Saudi banks earn 15-16% domestically, readers understand that going to Malaysia at 10.65% means they're deliberately accepting 5% lower returns abroad - which must be for strategic reasons like diversification and Islamic finance expertise monetization, not pure profit maximization.
It is important to clarify in this section of our analysis that Al Rajhi's 21.1% ROE is way above the 15.6% sector average.
By adding Saudi Awwal Bank at 16% ROE (which is close to sector average), we prove that even "normal" Saudi banks earn strong domestic returns around 15-16%.
This makes the opportunity cost real for all Saudi banks, not just Al Rajhi, which strengthens our argument as a sector-wide strategic pattern rather than one exceptional bank's story.
Risk-Adjusted Return Analysis
Saudi banks typically have a weighted cost of capital (WACC) of about 7-8% (this is the minimum return they need to make on investments).
In comparison, Malaysia is achieving a higher return on equity (ROE) of 10.65% with its investments. This means that the extra profit margin (or spread) they earn—after covering their costs—is about 2.65-3.65% (calculated as ROE minus the WACC).
But in Saudi Arabia, banks are earning a larger margin—around 7-8%—because their ROE is about 15%.
ℹ︎
Signals:
● The smaller spread (2.65-3.65%) in Malaysia might seem less attractive financially, especially when considering exchange rate risks
● The larger spread (7-8%) in Saudi Arabia offers more profit but comes with different risks, mainly related currently to oil prices and geopolitics
Is the smaller profit margin in Malaysia worth it? That depends. For institutions that want to diversify geographically and are focused on Islamic finance, the answer could be yes—especially when long-term trends and supportive policies in Malaysia make this a sustainable and attractive opportunity.
Conclusion
Saudi banks are careful about where they choose to operate. They have a presence in Malaysia but are not involved in India. This shows that they are making smart decisions about how to use their money and resources, choosing markets where they can do the best job and make the most profit, based on how those markets work.
Different countries use different approaches that work best for their goals. In Malaysia, the Islamic banking sector is growing fast, making up almost half of the market, thanks to government support and good regulations. This creates a good environment for banks that specialize in Shariah-compliant finance.
In India, the banking system focused on building strong local banks that work well for encouraging financial inclusion and helping more people access banking services. While leading international banks wisely moved their money from India to markets where they could earn higher returns with lower risks.
Both of these results make sense based on different policy goals. Malaysia is focusing on becoming a leader in Islamic finance, while India is aiming to include more people in the financial system and support economic development.
Smart planning means understanding these differences and investing money where the strengths of each country match the market environment. Instead of expanding just to reach more places, they put resources where they can get the best returns based on solid economic reasons.
More this Weekend
The 90+ Barrier: Unlocking Saudi Profit in a Tough New Video Game Market
Analyzing Saudi Arabia’s strategic approach to its substantial investments in the online gaming and e-sports industries necessitates a nuanced understanding of current global industry dynamics and associated risks.
Future of Milk in Saudi Arabia: A Cost-Led Pathway with Precision Fermentation Technology
The dairy industry in Saudi Arabia has historically been centered around livestock farming, with production heavily dependent on land, water, and challenging climate conditions. In recent years, the country has increasingly turned to technological innovations but still to better manage these biological cycles, to enhance efficiency and sustainability in milk production.
